IRAP IRAP IRAP IRAP
  • WHO WE ARE
    • Mission & Values
    • Our Team
    • Our Board
    • Press Room
    • Annual Report & Financials
    • Contact Us
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Our Model
      • Our Chapters
      • Our Pro Bono Partners
    • Litigation
    • Systemic Advocacy
    • Special Immigrant Visa Advocacy
    • Complementary Pathways & Europe Work
    • Muslim Ban Response
    • Impact
    • Blog
  • WHO WE SERVE
    • Abdullah’s Story
    • Farah’s Story
    • The Ibrahims’ Story
    • Layla’s Story
    • Najat’s Story
    • Sayed’s Story
  • RESOURCES
    • Airport Arrivals
    • Menores Centroamericanos (CAM): Reiniciando Programa para Ciertos Solicitantes
    • Work Authorization for Asylum Seekers
    • Iraqi Deportation Resources
    • Iranian Religious Minorities (Lautenberg HIAS) Resources
    • SIV Program Resources
    • Attorney/Student Resources
    • RFR Self Help Guides
    • IRAP Publications
  • GET INVOLVED
    • Donate
    • Subscribe
    • Get Action Alerts
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Externs, Interns, and Fellows
    • Independent Contractor & Consulting Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Alumni Association
IRAP IRAP
  • WHO WE ARE
    • Mission & Values
    • Our Team
    • Our Board
    • Press Room
    • Annual Report & Financials
    • Contact Us
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Our Model
      • Our Chapters
      • Our Pro Bono Partners
    • Litigation
    • Systemic Advocacy
    • Special Immigrant Visa Advocacy
    • Complementary Pathways & Europe Work
    • Muslim Ban Response
    • Impact
    • Blog
  • WHO WE SERVE
    • Abdullah’s Story
    • Farah’s Story
    • The Ibrahims’ Story
    • Layla’s Story
    • Najat’s Story
    • Sayed’s Story
  • RESOURCES
    • Airport Arrivals
    • Menores Centroamericanos (CAM): Reiniciando Programa para Ciertos Solicitantes
    • Work Authorization for Asylum Seekers
    • Iraqi Deportation Resources
    • Iranian Religious Minorities (Lautenberg HIAS) Resources
    • SIV Program Resources
    • Attorney/Student Resources
    • RFR Self Help Guides
    • IRAP Publications
  • GET INVOLVED
    • Donate
    • Subscribe
    • Get Action Alerts
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Externs, Interns, and Fellows
    • Independent Contractor & Consulting Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Alumni Association
Sep 12

Press Release: Reuters Exclusive Undercuts Claims by Government in Refugee Ban Lawsuit

  • September 12, 2018
  • Press Links, Press Releases
  • JFS v. Trump, refugee ban, Reuters report, US Refugee Admissions Program

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                                     

September 12, 2018

PRESS CONTACTS

Betsy Fisher, IRAP, 646-459-3081, media@refugeerights.org

Adela de la Torre, NILC, 202-384-1275, delatorre@nilc.org

Bill Swersey, HIAS, 202-412-1678, bill.swersey@hias.org

Mindy Berkowitz, Jewish Family Services of Silicon Valley, 408-357-7455, mindyb@jfssv.org

 

REUTERS EXCLUSIVE UNDERCUTS CLAIMS BY GOVERNMENT IN REFUGEE BAN LAWSUIT

SEATTLE, WA – Today, Reuters published an exclusive report on how the Trump Administration reverse-engineered the suspension of refugee admissions issued in October 2017, which resulted in halting the processing of refugees from 11 countries, 9 of which are Muslim-majority, despite the Administration’s own determination that these suspensions were not necessary. The suspension has resulted in grinding to a trickle refugee admissions from those countries and endangering thousands of people fleeing violence who were in the pipeline to travel to the United States.

The article undercuts the government’s claims in the lawsuit, JFS v. Trump, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, which challenged the October suspension. In opposing the plaintiffs’ papers in that case, the government asserted that the restrictions had been a product of an extensive internal review conducted pursuant to last year’s second Executive Order banning nationals from a number of Muslim-majority countries from entering the United states. However, the report reveals that the internal review had actually resulted in a recommendation not to suspend refugee processing:

Conducted in the summer and fall of 2017, the review concluded that refugees from all countries could safely be allowed to enter with some tightening of vetting, according to seven current or former U.S. officials who helped formulate or were briefed on the findings.

White House staff, including Miller and Kelly, were not happy with that conclusion, said one current and two former officials. In particular, the White House wanted to continue barring refugees from Somalia . . . for reasons that were unclear, the two former officials and a second current official said. That posed a problem: The working group had found no evidence that Somali refugees presented a unique threat.

Homeland Security officials proposed that when admissions were resumed, the government would conduct a further 90-day review of refugees from 11 countries, including Somalia. During that time, refugees from the countries would remain effectively blocked.

Some members of the working group felt the additional review – which directly affected thousands of refugees – was unnecessary, designed solely to satisfy White House officials.

In December 2017, in response to Plaintiffs’ motion, the court preliminarily enjoined the government from enforcing the October refugee ban. Today’s report reveals, however, that despite the court order, the Administration has continued to slow roll refugee processing from the 11 countries through extensive security checks that appear not to be related to any security needs. In fact, according to a report by the International Crisis Group also released today, the FBI’s security check delays have resulted in a backlog of 95,000 cases of refugees from the 11 countries while they clear only one case per day. These added security checks affect nationals of countries that comprised 40% of all refugees coming to the United States and the majority of Muslim refugees admitted in recent years.

Today’s Reuters report confirms Plaintiffs’ allegations in the lawsuit that the government’s policies on refugees are informed by hostility towards Muslims rather than objective assessments of national security. Time and time again, the Administration has targeted Muslim-majority countries in particular — and in this case, against the advice of their own national security officials. This report also follows on the heel of last week’s NBC report revealing that the Trump administration has exaggerated potential security threats posed by refugees and dismissed intelligence assessments from career officials.

Meanwhile, the individual plaintiffs in JFS, including an Iraqi man hiding in Egypt who had worked as a translator for the U.S. military, and a Somali refugee trying to be reunited with his wife and son, are no closer to finding relief, despite the December court order. The government is now considering even further reductions on the number of refugees to be admitted to the United States.

Jewish Family Service v. Trump was brought on behalf of Jewish Family Service of Seattle, Jewish Family Services of Silicon Valley, and nine individual plaintiffs by attorneys at the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP); the National Immigration Law Center (NILC); Perkins Coie LLP; HIAS, the global Jewish nonprofit that protects refugees; and other individual attorneys.

To view the press release, click here.

###

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail

Related Posts

  • Plaintiffs Affected by Refugee Ban Rejoice After Settlement AnnouncedFebruary 11, 2020
  • Press Release: Major Settlement Secures Relief For Refugees Left Behind by Refugee BanFebruary 10, 2020
  • Press Release: Groups Respond to Court Ruling Allowing Refugee Ban Lawsuit to ProceedJuly 30, 2018
  • Press Release: Groups Respond to Court Ruling Allowing Refugee Ban Lawsuit to ContinueMarch 29, 2018

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

  • Press Release: New IRAP Report Recommends Action to Address Delays in Family Reunification Process
  • IRAP Urges USCIS Not to Terminate Important Humanitarian Parole Programs
  • Press Release: IRAP Calls for Emergency Increase in Refugee Admissions
  • IRAP Advocacy Week Brings Together Students From 19 Law School Chapters To Meet With Their Legislators
  • Press Release: IRAP Welcomes Biden Administration’s Immigration Bill

Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • December 2008

Categories

  • Blog
  • Featured Blog
  • Featured Press
  • Press Links
  • Press Releases
  • Stories
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
© IRAP 2020 | Contact| Privacy Policy