||a columnist on
website, gives his view on the New European Intifada
New European Intifada
15th November 2005
The European Intifada is not
a new phenomenon.
As Lorenzo Vidino wrote recently in The
Muslim Brotherhood's Conquest of Europe "Europe
has become an incubator for Islamist thought and political
development. Since the early 1960s, Muslim Brotherhood
members and sympathizers have moved to Europe and slowly
but steadily established a wide and well-organized network
of mosques, charities, and Islamic organizations. Unlike
the larger Islamic community, the Muslim Brotherhood's ultimate
goal may not be simply "to help Muslims be the best
citizens they can be," but rather to extend Islamic
law throughout Europe and the United States.
Four decades of teaching and cultivation have paid off.
The student refugees who migrated from the Middle East forty
years ago and their descendants now lead organizations that
represent the local Muslim communities in their engagement
with Europe's political elite. Funded by generous contributors
from the Persian Gulf, they preside over a centralized network
that spans nearly every European country.
Mainstream public face
These organizations represent themselves as mainstream,
even as they continue to embrace the Brotherhood's radical
views and maintain links to terrorists. With moderate rhetoric
and well-spoken German, Dutch, and French, they have gained
acceptance among European governments and media alike. Politicians
across the political spectrum rush to engage them whenever
an issue involving Muslims arises or, more parochially,
when they seek the vote of the burgeoning Muslim community.
But, speaking Arabic or Turkish before their fellows Muslims,
they drop their facade and embrace radicalism. While their
representatives speak about interfaith dialogue and integration
on television, their mosques preach hate and warn worshippers
about the evils of Western society. While they publicly
condemn the murder of commuters in Madrid and school children
in Russia, they continue to raise money for Hamas and other
terrorist organizations. Europeans, eager to create a dialogue
with their increasingly disaffected Muslim minority, overlook
this duplicity. The case is particularly visible in Germany,
which retains a place of key importance in Europe; not only
because of its location at the heart of Europe, but also
because it played host to the first major wave of Muslim
Brotherhood immigrants and is host to the best-organized
Brotherhood presence. The German government's reaction is
also instructive if only to show the dangers of accepting
Muslim Brotherhood rhetoric at face value, without looking
at the broader scope of its activities.
On February 20, 2004, DEBKA-Net-Weekly and DEBKAfile
revealed that the whole of Western Europe had been penetrated
by Al Qaeda terrorist cells preparing to unleash the European
Intifada as part of the Global Jihad to establish the European
Caliphate and Dar-Al-Islam.
Military style units
In the article it states that, According to French
counter-intelligence, Al Qaeda has recruited in France alone
between 35,000 and 45,000 men and is organizing them into
military-style units. They meet regularly for training in
the use of weapons and explosives, combat tactics and indoctrination
and are controlled from local and district command centres
under the organizations national French command.
In Germany, Al Qaeda has recruited 25,000 to 30,000 men.
The British domestic intelligence agency MI5 estimates 10,000
faithful have joined up in Britain, providing Blunkett with
more than ample cause for concern.
On Thursday 18th November 2004 BBC
Online news service ran a news report about terrorism
in Iraq that stated that three French citizens were killed
by Americans troops in Iraq whilst fighting for the insurgents.
These were named as 24-year-old Tarek W, from Paris, killed
on 17 September, 19-year-old Redouane el-Hakim, killed on
17 July and Abdel Halim Badjoudj, 19, killed on 20 October.
As you can see from their names, they were Muslim immigrants
living in France.
They, like us, will not escape the
nightmare of Eurabia.
In the world of the media the fact that all of those youths
who were shooting police officers, murdering old white men
and setting alight disabled white women were all Black Muslims,
Arab Muslims and other immigrant Muslims could not of course
be mentioned. Just like the way the British public are patronised
by the British media, then the French public must also given
what is universally called the Mushroom Treatment
by the French Media and kept in the dark and fed on bullshit
not facts. For if the truth came out about the riots then
the native French people might realise that they have been
duped, deluded and deceived by their political masters and
the media for decades, and then they may begin to vote for
the Front National who have not lied to them for the last
forty years. Even though the lie that we have been
enriched by immigration and immigrants is now as tattered
and torn as the French flags which the Al Qaeda Youths Brigades
burnt in the streets of France, it is still the only lie
that matters to the liars that run our nations.
The riots are in fact the first shots to be
fired in the European Intifada as part of the Global Jihad
to establish the European Caliphate and Dar-Al-Islam. The
riots are racist pogroms and outbreaks of Religious Cleansing
to clear French whites / Christians from the inner city
areas occupied by immigrant Muslim terrorists and their
immigrant / white leftists sympathisers and to create autonomous
immigrant only Muslim Zones where the writ of the French
state and secular law no longer runs, but where Sharia Law
and the Imam are the sovereign power on the streets.
This is easy to prove. The targets in these
riots were not random, but deliberate and targeted. They
were spread and organised as a show of strength against
the French State and its methodology is both clear and far
thinking. The fact that Primary Schools were burnt down
by the rioters is due to the fact that the Muslim terrorist
leaders in French communities have realised that in order
to educate future generations of terrorists to overthrow
the French state they need to remove Muslim children from
the State education system that preaches a code of secularism
and tolerance. The children that would have been educated
in those primary schools will now be taught in the Mosques
and the secret network of madrasses that exist in France
will teach them their ideology of jihad instead. That way
a generation of terrorists can be inculcated with the ideology
of Intifada terror, trained in terrorism techniques and
then sent out to fight for the European Caliphate when the
time is ready.
Other targets were hit in order to remove Whites
from those areas entirely. The burning down of white run
and owned businesses and factories in inner city areas,
that were run by Whites and staffed by Whites, means those
businesses will no longer operate in those areas in future.
This will ensure that the numbers of whites in those inner
city areas will diminish as they will no longer be required
to travel into those areas and work in those factories.
No Muslim businesses were burned down in the riots which
shows that this was the plan of the rioters.
The racist targeting of old white people, white
businesses and white property in the riots will also cause
the remaining whites in those areas to flee those areas
and thereby allow in more Muslims to take over those abandoned
homes thereby strengthening the power of the Muslim terrorists
in those areas.
The youth have been taught to overcome their
fear of the police in the riots, the youth who were most
violent in the confrontations will now rise to the top of
the psycho league table in the gangs in those
areas thereby setting the standard for terror in the future
and the White police have now been de-humanised in the minds
of the youth and now made into moving targets for future
War against the West
The July 7th terrorist attacks and the failed suicide bombings
two weeks later, the French riots and the riots across Britain
in 2000 are all part of a de-centralised but strategic,
ideologically and theologically driven, war against the
West. The terrorists have no central chain of command (nor
do they need one) but instead operate by a unified methodology
of terror by using the same techniques of terrorism, they
share the same means in relation to how they have entered
our country via immigration and they co-ordinate the war
for Global Jihad by using the internet, the media and sympathetic
individuals in mosques.
These Wahhabist fanatics are foaming at the mouth with
hatred for West, yet their greatest defenders are the pet
white liberals that can see no further than their own skin
colour and the skin colour of the terrorists. Whilst the
terrorists are preparing to wage war against us all, the
white Liberal Elite traitors and the pathetic white Establishment
are preparing to surrender us to them without a shot being
fired back in our defence. The day will come when those
White traitors and liberals that acted as the apologists
for the European Intifada and deaths of innocent whites
will face justice for their crimes against our people and
The BNP is the last bastion of the defence of Western Civilisation
and British culture in this country. Whilst the liberal
filth that run this country prostrate themselves like dogs
before any ethnic that mutters the magic word racism
, only the BNP dare to stand against both them and
the racist/ religious terrorists that have infiltrated and
are poisoning our nation.
If these riots had broke out in Britain, and the BNP were
in charge of the country at that time, then I would have
asked the Party to pass the following preventive measures:
1) A curfew would be imposed and all those immigrants or
descendants of immigrants arrested in any rioting would
be deported immediately to their ancestral homelands (as
defined by their or their parents / grandparents nationality)
and their British passports revoked.
2) The police would have been instructed to liaise with
the National and Border Security Police Force that we intend
to set up and to use non-deadly force including rubber bullets,
night time curfews, tear gas, snatch squads and preventive
arrest (based on intelligence) against the rioters. Those
that fired guns against the police in riots would be liable
to be shot dead by trained police marksmen operating in
3) Local home owners / business owners would have been
authorised to use force to defend their homes and property
and no criminal charges would be laid against them
in relation to any rioters killed in the execution of any
attacks on their home or property.
4) All religious institutions and individuals linked with
those institutions suspected of involvement in organising
or supporting the riots would be shut down and the leaders
of those establishments deported.
5) The media would be barred from areas where riots were
under way, as the media in France are being used to spread
details of how the rioters were operating (thereby encouraging
copy cat incidents elsewhere). The media in France have
not been reporting objective facts about the riots (the
same as the British media did not in relation to the riots
in Britain in 2000) such as their ethnic identities, real
causes of the riots and their religion and instead have
been acting as apologists for the rioters and therefore
the rioters and the media are all part a synergistic process
of violence/ apologist statements and proliferation. The
media are the mechanism whereby riots spread across countries
and therefore the media will be required to file
their reports via a State Information System that provides
them with information rather than make up lies to support
their own political agendas. The fact that the media have
not once reported the racist nature of the attacks upon
elderly whites in the French riots shows the racist nature
of the French media and also the clear political nature
of the media itself. Those journalists that break the law
in this respect and report false facts relating to those
riots will be arrested and jailed for Inciting Disorder.
The head of one of France's major news services has even
admitted censoring coverage of the French riots that would
have revealed the ethnic makeup of the rioters because he
feared the Front National would benefit from more comprehensive
Jean-Claude Dassier, chief executive of news channel LCI,
has also complained that other broadcasters' coverage of
the unrest had been "excessive" and may even have
encouraged rioters. He said " Politics in France is
heading to the right and I don't want rightwing politicians
back in second, or even first place because we showed burning
cars on television," he told a conference in Amsterdam.
The idea that a single, unelected, media hack can dictate
what information the entire French people and French nation
receive about the riots shows the criminal power of the
media. He continues saying that "Journalism is not
simply a matter of switching on the cameras and letting
them roll. You have to think about what you're broadcasting,"
he added. In other words, unless what you show on the media
supports the current political elite and their failed ideological
solutions then it should not be shown even if the truth
has to be hidden and the lie become the public reality.
In modern consumer societies all of politics is based solely
on perceptions we as individuals have about our society
and our nation. These perceptions about our society derive
almost totally from the news media, as most of us are not
in a position to be able to travel around our countries
finding about what is really going in every community all
of the time. Therefore what the media says is going on in
our country forms the basis of who we vote for and why we
are voting for them. The media control our democracy, not
the politicians, as what the media says is happening in
our nations forms the motivation for individuals to vote
for particular political parties. The social consensus in
all nations is a product of the media.
All political parties depend upon the media to support
them in order to get power, and then once in power those
political parties pass laws that give tax breaks and other
benefits to those media groups that support them, thereby
showing the innate corrupt nature of our so called 'democratic
nations' and democratic systems. Only when the power of
the media over peoples minds is broken, will true democracy
arise in our nations.
The media are utterly unaccountable to any one other than
their owners belying the democratic deficit in modern societies.
Only when the media are forced only to tell the truth about
what is happening, and not manipulate the news in order
to get public support for the political parties that they
' sponsor ' and advertise in their papers, will we live
in a true democracy.